Nepal anyone?

So...will the maoist control of the government help the anarchist movement? why or why not? =D

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

They refer to us as reactionaries - in true Marxist form. Yes the do favor centralization of power ect however better them than the cappies .

Inkus2000 wrote:

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

They refer to us as reactionaries - in true Marxist form. Yes the do favor centralization of power ect however better them than the cappies .

True.

Inkus2000 wrote:

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

They refer to us as reactionaries - in true Marxist form. Yes the do favor centralization of power ect however better them than the cappies .

Reactionaries?

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Inkus2000 wrote:

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

They refer to us as reactionaries - in true Marxist form. Yes the do favor centralization of power ect however better them than the cappies .

Reactionaries?

Yea - we exist as a reaction to capitalism true in sence - however they think they know the 'one true path to communism' as written by their God Karl Marx.

Exactly... However, I've seen Anarchists like this. You just have to be open minded.

A good example of a close minded person would be Mao. He's trying to do the right thing, but it's his way or the highway there.

KenCat wrote:

Exactly... However, I've seen Anarchists like this. You just have to be open minded.

A good example of a close minded person would be Mao. He's trying to do the right thing, but it's his way or the highway there.

True I would describe Mao as a good revolutionary but a poor leader.

I have read Mao - the unkown story by jung chang - it is complete nonsence, half of the book is her personal opinion of Mao - which is naturally bad considering her familly suffered during the cultural revolution. She vents her repressed childhood rage on Mao.If you want to understand why she attempts to blacken Mao's name read Wild Swans - her first book.

That said Mao caused many catastorophic reforms - although unintentional.

"That said Mao caused many catastorophic reforms - although unintentional."

What do you mean?

KenCat wrote:

"That said Mao caused many catastorophic reforms - although unintentional."

What do you mean?

His great leap forward was a disaster - in attempting to industrialize China in the manner they did - agriculture was neglected to the extent that it caused a man made famine.

Inkus2000 wrote:

KenCat wrote:

"That said Mao caused many catastorophic reforms - although unintentional."

What do you mean?

His great leap forward was a disaster - in attempting to industrialize China in the manner they did - agriculture was neglected to the extent that it caused a man made famine.

I get you now.. This is why many think of China as a Capitalist (Industrial?) Communism.

KenCat wrote:

Inkus2000 wrote:

KenCat wrote:

"That said Mao caused many catastorophic reforms - although unintentional."

What do you mean?

His great leap forward was a disaster - in attempting to industrialize China in the manner they did - agriculture was neglected to the extent that it caused a man made famine.

I get you now.. This is why many think of China as a Capitalist (Industrial?) Communism.

No that came later - Deng Xiaoping began market liberalization in the 1980's - this was the begining of their transition towards capitalism/fashism - the in 2003 they began to allow buisness owners to join the communist party. Ironic - capitalists in the communist party lol

Anyway the party is split
a- those asossiated with the communist youthleauge - leftists
b- the shanghi clique - neo liberal/fashists

Inkus2000 wrote:

KenCat wrote:

Inkus2000 wrote:

KenCat wrote:

"That said Mao caused many catastorophic reforms - although unintentional."

What do you mean?

His great leap forward was a disaster - in attempting to industrialize China in the manner they did - agriculture was neglected to the extent that it caused a man made famine.

I get you now.. This is why many think of China as a Capitalist (Industrial?) Communism.

No that came later - Deng Xiaoping began market liberalization in the 1980's - this was the begining of their transition towards capitalism/fashism - the in 2003 they began to allow buisness owners to join the communist party. Ironic - capitalists in the communist party lol

Anyway the party is split
a- those asossiated with the communist youthleauge - leftists
b- the shanghi clique - neo liberal/fashists

Thanks a lot, it makes sense.

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

Well obviously they, themselves, won't help our movement intentionally. But what they do could effect their standing with the people. At least people will say "fuck that" and not like authoritarian communism that much more. But as far as significant help to our movement, i'd say there is little to none to be found here.

Anarchist.Dagger wrote:

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

Meowists! Yay! I don't think so, because you do have to remember that these cute little care bears are state communists (which I hear them get called constantly) or what I preferably like to call them bureaucratic collectivists which is derived from Stalinism. Their only intention is to keep control and not reason with so called "petty bourgeois" anarchists. They see the anarchist movement as revisionist, as I was told by one.

Anyone object?

Well obviously they, themselves, won't help our movement intentionally. But what they do could effect their standing with the people. At least people will say "fuck that" and not like authoritarian communism that much more. But as far as significant help to our movement, i'd say there is little to none to be found here.

The only way in which authoritarian communism helps Anarchism is that it shows people tyranny and they get fed up.

solpacvoicis wrote:

So...will the maoist control of the government help the anarchist movement? why or why not? =D

i dont think any authoritarian form of communism will help our anarchist movement. i used to think that it might have some positive influence, but now that i think about it, it wouldnt. there are a lot of communists who arent leninists though. these people are ok, because they accept things like anarchism. council communism is one of those ideologies.

god0fmusic wrote:

solpacvoicis wrote:

So...will the maoist control of the government help the anarchist movement? why or why not? =D

i dont think any authoritarian form of communism will help our anarchist movement. i used to think that it might have some positive influence, but now that i think about it, it wouldnt. there are a lot of communists who arent leninists though. these people are ok, because they accept things like anarchism. council communism is one of those ideologies.

It could indirectly help us (by making authoritarian systems look bad).

god0fmusic wrote:

solpacvoicis wrote:

So...will the maoist control of the government help the anarchist movement? why or why not? =D

i dont think any authoritarian form of communism will help our anarchist movement. i used to think that it might have some positive influence, but now that i think about it, it wouldnt. there are a lot of communists who arent leninists though. these people are ok, because they accept things like anarchism. council communism is one of those ideologies.

Council communism is one of those ideologies that what?

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

god0fmusic wrote:

solpacvoicis wrote:

So...will the maoist control of the government help the anarchist movement? why or why not? =D

i dont think any authoritarian form of communism will help our anarchist movement. i used to think that it might have some positive influence, but now that i think about it, it wouldnt. there are a lot of communists who arent leninists though. these people are ok, because they accept things like anarchism. council communism is one of those ideologies.

Council communism is one of those ideologies that what?

its one of those marxist ideologies that arent inclined towards leninism. and they are probably nowhere near as coercive as marxist-leninist ideologies. right?

im kind of tired right now, so forgive me if a say something really stupid.

Inkus2000 wrote:

They refer to us as reactionaries - in true Marxist form. Yes the do favor centralization of power ect however better them than the cappies .

Anarchists reactionaries? LOL

I debate with Maoists and Stalinists because everywere its been put in what it turned out is totalitarian Dictatorship somewhat like Despotism, i would choose minor labor exploitation over totally controlled and slaved any day!

and i thought you liked me as a cappie

god0fmusic wrote:

InsurgenteCujo wrote:

god0fmusic wrote:

solpacvoicis wrote:

So...will the maoist control of the government help the anarchist movement? why or why not? =D

i dont think any authoritarian form of communism will help our anarchist movement. i used to think that it might have some positive influence, but now that i think about it, it wouldnt. there are a lot of communists who arent leninists though. these people are ok, because they accept things like anarchism. council communism is one of those ideologies.

Council communism is one of those ideologies that what?

its one of those marxist ideologies that arent inclined towards leninism. and they are probably nowhere near as coercive as marxist-leninist ideologies. right?

im kind of tired right now, so forgive me if a say something really stupid.

Your right, council communism is much more on the left side of communism just as autonomism. But autonomism is more anarchistic while council communism is not, it could be though since its anti leninist communism.

Rename wrote:

Inkus2000 wrote:

They refer to us as reactionaries - in true Marxist form. Yes the do favor centralization of power ect however better them than the cappies .

Anarchists reactionaries? LOL

I debate with Maoists and Stalinists because everywere its been put in what it turned out is totalitarian Dictatorship somewhat like Despotism, i would choose minor labor exploitation over totally controlled and slaved any day!

and i thought you liked me as a cappie

And how does that turn out?

Rename wrote:

i would choose minor labor exploitation over totally controlled and slaved any day!

Never settle for less.

KenCat wrote:

Rename wrote:

i would choose minor labor exploitation over totally controlled and slaved any day!

Never settle for less.

Good quote, i definately agree... but right now don't have much of a choice.